清空播放记录
猜你喜欢
剧照
更新时间：2023-08-16 04:31
详细剧情
大师们的命题作文，八位电影大师用各自的手法为我们解读了时间的含义。 贝纳多•贝托鲁奇在印度寓言中寻找答案，10分钟恋爱、结婚、生子，生活如水；迈克尔•菲吉斯将屏幕分成四块，让灵魂回望10分钟，把楼梯作为生死通道；伊利•曼佐的镜头下，老去的电影明星回顾黑白电影的片段，10分钟，已是好几个人生；......最后，让•吕克•戈达尔选择了10个“最后的几分钟”，试图告诉人们时间的真相，也让人思索，时间的几分钟会是什么样子？
长篇影评
1 ) 关于时间2
目前最喜欢的是《关于时间2》，写一点东西（刚刚不小心写讨论去了复制过来，讨论那里先不删了也..
个人一点看法，还没有找到很好的解析：
可以基本确定的是主人公，亲吻女人的人、写作的人、小男孩是同一个人的三个阶段。主人公就是mark。这三个阶段是主人公（死去）之后怀念自己的人生的几个故事。
电视机里的老人应该是二人死后的对应。（不过这么解释就让之后中年Mark去电视机前叫爸妈显得不合理，但是根据结尾的定格，以及女子弹琴时候老妇的“配音”应该是对的。）
Mark应该是在二战中死了。在这之前他遇见了那个女人，可是他们却错过于他没有性能力（所以不能生育？所以这个也就可以解释为什么那个女人在医院跑？）
中年Mark应该是Mark死去的形态，他手里的照片是女人的照片，他在怀念女人，一直到最后的场景、老年Mark都在抱着女人的照片。
年轻Mark之前有一段很bdsm的（我估计是sex video)，这是被他隐藏的回忆吗？
童年Mark应该是隐喻了后来参军的年轻Mark。
他们的相遇，中年Mark回去是担任了一种内心的另一个自己的形象；在这个场景里面所有的回忆元素都为他们对独白配音，所以这一段是人生中（life）最重要的回忆。
不太make sense的地方：女人在医院奔跑、医院的哭泣的两个人是什么作用；sex video是什么（有人说隐喻希特勒和丘吉尔，丘吉尔被斯大林 按倒在身下？？？？我不苟同）；为什么要把两个老人放在电视机里穿上衣服（也许是为了表示是死人）；Martin是谁？
2 ) 失落的百花深处
很喜欢陈凯歌这个小短篇，当他精心烹调《无极》这道大菜的时候是有点刻意高调过了火侯，这道小菜类似游戏之作，放下架子来拍倒是做到了简单清爽游刃有余，虽然凭此翻不前案，但作为第五代大师的功底还是可见一斑。能拍出《黄土地》、《霸王别姬》的导演，总希望他能安静的再拍出一些可看的片子来。
剧中一疯子带着搬家公司去百花深处胡同，声称要搬家，搬家公司到了才发现这已经变成待建的荒地，唯独一棵大槐树还标识着当年的百花深处胡同。搬家公司一行人才发现所谓冯先生是个疯子，但为了拿钱，他们装模作样的搬鱼缸、花瓶，反而为疯子对故居四合院真挚的感情所打动。
故事说白了没什么意思，导演的功底在镜头的表现力上，那个突然缓缓落地的青花瓷，从疯子的幻想中突然化为现实画面，让观众跟他一同体验了心碎的瞬间；最后那个从泥土中挖出的铜玲铛，叮叮当当叮叮当当让所有人顺着疯子快乐的目光看见了槐树下的四合院，水墨风格的电脑特技把这些北京人心中的四合院记忆化为完美的影像，周围是千篇一律的冷冰冰的高楼大厦，然后是破败的拆迁荒地，那一树浅绿下的红墙青瓦像极了荒芜中仅存一点美好，那一刻，观众同搬家公司一行人一同恍惚在美好的百花深处，此刻，他们才发现自己也是那么的怀念失去的家园，原来人人都有这么一个失去故园的伤口。
平日里，正常的人们也会不经意见怀念自己的老家，会想念那个四合院、那棵槐树、那个摆着小摊的巷子口……但是这种感伤总会让位于现代化过程的理性目标，现代化是一个进步的神话，以摧毁过去创造现在而且永远有一个更美好的目标，于是人们认为故园的失去毕竟是值得或者是不可避免的。陈凯歌用了一个疯子为主角，他没有理性的约束，因而感情无比真挚强烈，可以嘲笑他甚至欺骗他，但是一不留神，心中隐藏的那个关于故园伤口，竟被他撕开，流出浓浓的怀念和伤感。
剧中一疯子带着搬家公司去百花深处胡同，声称要搬家，搬家公司到了才发现这已经变成待建的荒地，唯独一棵大槐树还标识着当年的百花深处胡同。搬家公司一行人才发现所谓冯先生是个疯子，但为了拿钱，他们装模作样的搬鱼缸、花瓶，反而为疯子对故居四合院真挚的感情所打动。
故事说白了没什么意思，导演的功底在镜头的表现力上，那个突然缓缓落地的青花瓷，从疯子的幻想中突然化为现实画面，让观众跟他一同体验了心碎的瞬间；最后那个从泥土中挖出的铜玲铛，叮叮当当叮叮当当让所有人顺着疯子快乐的目光看见了槐树下的四合院，水墨风格的电脑特技把这些北京人心中的四合院记忆化为完美的影像，周围是千篇一律的冷冰冰的高楼大厦，然后是破败的拆迁荒地，那一树浅绿下的红墙青瓦像极了荒芜中仅存一点美好，那一刻，观众同搬家公司一行人一同恍惚在美好的百花深处，此刻，他们才发现自己也是那么的怀念失去的家园，原来人人都有这么一个失去故园的伤口。
平日里，正常的人们也会不经意见怀念自己的老家，会想念那个四合院、那棵槐树、那个摆着小摊的巷子口……但是这种感伤总会让位于现代化过程的理性目标，现代化是一个进步的神话，以摧毁过去创造现在而且永远有一个更美好的目标，于是人们认为故园的失去毕竟是值得或者是不可避免的。陈凯歌用了一个疯子为主角，他没有理性的约束，因而感情无比真挚强烈，可以嘲笑他甚至欺骗他，但是一不留神，心中隐藏的那个关于故园伤口，竟被他撕开，流出浓浓的怀念和伤感。
3 ) 十分钟年华老去之狗没有地狱
在十五位顶级导演的《十分钟年华老去》中，片首出现马可·奥利里乌斯的《冥想》：
时间是一条河流。一切创造物不可抵挡的浪潮。事物一旦映入眼帘便瞬时消逝然后被取代。它们的出现仅仅是为了被冲刷殆尽。
《狗没有地狱》只是其中一篇。同其余十几篇一样，时间的隐喻贯穿其中。除此之外，这部仅仅十分钟的短片，有人说他带着强烈的政治意象，指向个人命运在历史中的渺茫；也有人看到了这个“没有过去的男人”和他的情人分别多年之后于这10分钟相遇的动人，于冷冷的叙述中透出隐隐的热情；还有人将其看作一个长篇小说被截去的结尾，拿过来直接拍摄成电影，而其所留下的大段空白令人体味到想象的曼妙。总之，导演考里斯马基带着他的老班底，创造了一部延续自己风格的短片。
以上其实都不是我想要说的，因为这短短的十分钟过去以后，我的头脑里只出现了一句话：欧洲人拍的电影真难懂。于是倒回去，继续从头开始看。终于，在结尾处两个已不再年轻的人儿望着窗外火车行驶的画面中，我找到了暑假坐车离家的场景。影像的重叠，让我的感觉起来微妙的变化。
男人对女人说：“你看外面。”
“怎么了？”女人用一直的平淡而略带紧张感的声音问道。
“漆黑一片。”
“那又如何？”这时女人的脸在若隐若现的灯光下呈现出细密的皱纹。
“我们却在这里面。”
这段特别简短的对白结束以后，我越发清晰地回忆起那天的火车，当时外面如同短片里一样漆黑一片，我昏沉沉的想睡觉，因为刚刚离家怀有特殊的孤独感，也因为外面什么也看不见，车厢里却有暗淡的灯光而感到安全。不同的时间，不同的国度，不同的年龄，电影，没有过去的人，影像，现实，真实的我，因为这漆黑的夜空被交错起来，又绵延到一个玄妙的世界里。
到了这时我已经满足了。我的体会也就到此为止。缺乏对这部电影深厚背景的了解，我想我很难参透背后的所有深意。估计这十五个“十分钟年华老去”的短片，也只有陈凯歌的我能看得比较清晰。曾经有一个老师对我们说：“读任何文学作品而落泪，大约都是因为它触发了你本身的哀伤。”我想电影也是如此。现在打开百度，输入“狗没有地狱”或者“dogs have no hell”,都能出现一大堆网页，上面或相同或不同地告诉你影片的背景，导演的介绍及对电影的评论。实不相瞒，我的演讲之前出现的“有人说”此类字眼，这个“有人”都来自于网络那头某个素不相识的人，他或者复制粘贴或者原创地表达了对“狗没有地狱”这部短片的感受，令我们不用看影片，就可以不偏不倚的直视电影的核心。但从另一方面来看，这些文字无一例外的影响着我们的思维。带着评论去观看，我们或者努力地在其中寻找与政治相关的线索，而放弃了电影本身带来的快乐。换句话说，我们渴望感知的心被蒙蔽了。
我们为什么看电影呢？又为了什么听音乐，看画展，读书？因为那巨大的感染力吧，当然也不止如此。而那些正经八百的评论们使我们的头脑准确而机械地指向某些角度，让我们无时不受到它的吞噬。对这部“狗没有地狱”，大家一定有不同的感觉。汇集起来，又是一卷色彩斑斓的图画。我们的思想是我们自己的，它不受任何人左右。自豪的宣称吧！
时间是一条河流。一切创造物不可抵挡的浪潮。事物一旦映入眼帘便瞬时消逝然后被取代。它们的出现仅仅是为了被冲刷殆尽。
《狗没有地狱》只是其中一篇。同其余十几篇一样，时间的隐喻贯穿其中。除此之外，这部仅仅十分钟的短片，有人说他带着强烈的政治意象，指向个人命运在历史中的渺茫；也有人看到了这个“没有过去的男人”和他的情人分别多年之后于这10分钟相遇的动人，于冷冷的叙述中透出隐隐的热情；还有人将其看作一个长篇小说被截去的结尾，拿过来直接拍摄成电影，而其所留下的大段空白令人体味到想象的曼妙。总之，导演考里斯马基带着他的老班底，创造了一部延续自己风格的短片。
以上其实都不是我想要说的，因为这短短的十分钟过去以后，我的头脑里只出现了一句话：欧洲人拍的电影真难懂。于是倒回去，继续从头开始看。终于，在结尾处两个已不再年轻的人儿望着窗外火车行驶的画面中，我找到了暑假坐车离家的场景。影像的重叠，让我的感觉起来微妙的变化。
男人对女人说：“你看外面。”
“怎么了？”女人用一直的平淡而略带紧张感的声音问道。
“漆黑一片。”
“那又如何？”这时女人的脸在若隐若现的灯光下呈现出细密的皱纹。
“我们却在这里面。”
这段特别简短的对白结束以后，我越发清晰地回忆起那天的火车，当时外面如同短片里一样漆黑一片，我昏沉沉的想睡觉，因为刚刚离家怀有特殊的孤独感，也因为外面什么也看不见，车厢里却有暗淡的灯光而感到安全。不同的时间，不同的国度，不同的年龄，电影，没有过去的人，影像，现实，真实的我，因为这漆黑的夜空被交错起来，又绵延到一个玄妙的世界里。
到了这时我已经满足了。我的体会也就到此为止。缺乏对这部电影深厚背景的了解，我想我很难参透背后的所有深意。估计这十五个“十分钟年华老去”的短片，也只有陈凯歌的我能看得比较清晰。曾经有一个老师对我们说：“读任何文学作品而落泪，大约都是因为它触发了你本身的哀伤。”我想电影也是如此。现在打开百度，输入“狗没有地狱”或者“dogs have no hell”,都能出现一大堆网页，上面或相同或不同地告诉你影片的背景，导演的介绍及对电影的评论。实不相瞒，我的演讲之前出现的“有人说”此类字眼，这个“有人”都来自于网络那头某个素不相识的人，他或者复制粘贴或者原创地表达了对“狗没有地狱”这部短片的感受，令我们不用看影片，就可以不偏不倚的直视电影的核心。但从另一方面来看，这些文字无一例外的影响着我们的思维。带着评论去观看，我们或者努力地在其中寻找与政治相关的线索，而放弃了电影本身带来的快乐。换句话说，我们渴望感知的心被蒙蔽了。
我们为什么看电影呢？又为了什么听音乐，看画展，读书？因为那巨大的感染力吧，当然也不止如此。而那些正经八百的评论们使我们的头脑准确而机械地指向某些角度，让我们无时不受到它的吞噬。对这部“狗没有地狱”，大家一定有不同的感觉。汇集起来，又是一卷色彩斑斓的图画。我们的思想是我们自己的，它不受任何人左右。自豪的宣称吧！
4 ) 十分钟年华老去。下。
Bernardo Bertolucci 《Histoire d'eaux》（意大利）
Mike Figgis 《About Time 2》（美国）
Jirí Menzel 《One Moment》（捷克）
István Szabó 《Ten Minutes After》（匈牙利）
Claire Denis 《Vers Nancy》（法国）
Volker Schlondorff 《The Enlightenment》（德国）
Michael Radford 《Addicted to the Stars》（英国）
Jean-Luc Godard 《Dans le Noir du Temps》（法国）
1. Histoire d'eaux 水的故事
东方与西方，完全不同的民族和国家，不同的肤色和语言。他离开吹笛的老人，遇见她。相识相爱，结婚生子。从最初的一杯清水，到婚宴上的酒，到妻子产前破了的羊水，到最后男人回到老人面前跪地掩面而流下的泪水。
不是很喜欢这个短片。除了片末老人悠扬的笛声。生活充满起落和际遇，不同地域不同言语的人们相遇并且共同生活。平淡平凡，看透风景，细水长流。也许这便是这一段十分钟所代表的含义。
2. About Time 2 关于时间2
说实话，不甚喜欢。或者说，对于Mike Figgis的四格漫画式影片，看起来觉得眼花和头晕。我不知道目光究竟应该集中在那里，也不知道如何将目光分别扩散到屏幕的四个方向去捕捉和看清楚究竟每一格里面究竟在放什么。结果就是，我的眼睛集中在四格中央的黑点上，然后每一格都没有看完看清。
依稀记得的是一些片段。走廊与楼梯里高跟鞋清脆的奔跑声，老人们呼唤孩子名字的殷切，孩子们年少的局促，女人欢笑的红唇与指尖流淌出的清脆钢琴旋律，情欲的亲吻和缠绵……
可是，我实在不知道他想要表达什么。多么惭愧。笑。
3. One Moment 瞬间
这部短片的色彩有着清新淡然的田园风格。Menzel运用了捷克演员Rudolf Hrusinsky一生中拍摄的诸多影片的剪辑拼接成了这一段十分钟。他在院子的苹果树下小憩，朦胧中见到自己。年少时候的身影缓缓走来。黑白、泛黄再到彩色的一个个片段；英俊年轻、瘦长挺拔，成熟坚毅、魁梧强壮，再到松弛苍老却平静的同一张脸。
一生里他饰演了那么多不同的角色，有过那么多的辉煌与荣耀。他隔着铁丝网看见两个女孩。年轻写在脸上，肆意欢笑，短裙在风中飘扬，光滑纤长的腿在阳光里显得白皙而性感。他看她们骑车而过，逐渐消失。一个熟透的红苹果掉落在他的头上。
十分钟。往昔的成就与今昔的垂暮。不可挽回的老去与对年轻风华的眷恋。一切在苹果掉落的瞬间，嘎然而止。
4. Ten Minutes After 十分钟后
电视里一遍又一遍地播放着英语教学的节目。女人正在为结婚纪念日准备着丰富的晚餐。精美餐具，烛台佳肴，香槟蛋糕，还有摄像机。一切准备就绪，她等待着丈夫的归来以及两人甜蜜幸福的庆祝。
门铃响了，女人殷切地跑去开门，却看见醉酒后神志不清的丈夫。进屋后他不停地找酒，跌跌撞撞并且粗暴地吼叫和推搡。她没有生气，只是劝着他并且替他脱鞋宽衣希望他可以睡去。但男人是愤怒的。片中没有交代男人酒醉与暴躁的理由。只是她无法安抚并且使他平静下来，反而愈发地令他狂躁，渐渐丧失了最后的理智。他卡住了她的脖子，她在挣扎与慌乱中，用刀刺向了自己的丈夫。
十分钟。结婚纪念的精心准备一片狼藉，甜蜜温馨被扭打和流血所取代。丈夫被送去医院，警察在现场要求做笔录。电视里英语教学节目依然在继续，柜子上一张张印证着曾经共同欢乐时光的照片，寂静无声。
5. Vers Nancy 面对南希
不得不佩服Claire Denis，居然可以请来Jean-Luc Nancy这个享有盛誉的哲学家，更令人佩服的是，他让这位著名哲学家用了整整十分钟时间坐在火车里，展开了一场一对一的问答讲座，关于“介入”的意识形态，关于进入一个陌生地域的“挣脱”，关于时间、地点与自身交错转换的哲学思考。
专业的学术性话语冗长晦涩。女孩崇敬的眼神与身后黑人男子抽烟远眺的漫不经心形成鲜明的对比。火车还有十分钟即将到站。男人回到座位。他不经意地说，你们谈得真是兴致盎然。Nancy点头。
他答：“但是，时间结束一切”。
6. The Enlightenment 启迪
旁白来自一只小小的苍蝇。从它的口中缓缓地讲出Aurelius Augustinus这位基督神学大师对于时间的自问与论述。镜头忽高忽低摇曳不定，这是苍蝇飞行的轨迹。湖畔林间有一家人在野炊烧烤。人们的轻松闲散与旁白的哲理内涵相去甚远。一边讨论着过去、现在与将来，讨论着时间在点上的短暂与的永恒，而另一边则是嬉笑歌舞，尽情欢乐。
不同的肤色与不同的年纪，男女老幼，酒后小小的不和谐，平凡生活与真实家庭。而当苍蝇飞近正在烤肉的父亲时，他本能地举起铁勺挥舞驱赶，却勾到了上方的电线。瞬间，生命便消逝。接下来的情形是可以想象的。慌乱、哭泣、悲痛。欢乐被这些字眼取代，家庭不再完整。
片子结束在苍蝇撞上灭蝇灯的一瞬。旁白结束，蓝色的灯光变得模糊而斑斓，色彩融合在一起缓缓回归到黑暗。十分钟，一切的欢笑与惬意，任何的哲理与自省，都只是瞬间的逝灭。
7. Addicted to the Stars 沉溺于星
具有科幻的意味，从地球出发，穿越了时空，又来到80年后的地球。
此去经年，物是人非。机器与真人无异，城市翻天覆地，没有人行走，修女抽烟亦不行善。男人在夜里找到自己的家。推开门去，终于见到自己的儿子。眼前已是白发垂暮的老人，满脸皱纹，话语不清。自己仍是出发时的模样，正当壮年。父与子，相对无言感慨万千。他出发前的照片还在，身着宇航服，牵着十来岁的儿子，脸上都是幸福的笑容。
他带给他外星球的石头，然后不得不离去。走到门口的时候，老人缓缓地叫他爸爸。他说，爸爸，我爱你。他回过头来，百感交集。他说，我也爱你。话毕，他只身踏着清冷的街，于天色渐白的凌晨回到基地。
十分钟，时间给这对父子开了这样大的玩笑。孩子从童颜等到鹤发，漫长的一生对于父亲而言不过是短暂的瞬间。山中方一日，世上已千年。一生等待着的父爱与亲情，都因这一声苍老的“我爱你”，而显得格外悲怆与温馨，亦是感人至深。
8. Dans le Noir du Temps 在时间的黑暗中
写到这最后一部短片，Jean-Luc Godard的十分钟。涵盖了太多太多太多的东西，让一切的语言和文字都黯然失色，变得平乏和贫瘠。
拼贴、旁白、旧质的胶片、黑白与暗黄的色彩交错，开片的暗夜与剧终时的烛光，伴随着一部又一部名片佳作的片段。青春、勇气、思想、记忆、长存、爱情、沉默、故事、恐惧、永恒。最终回归到电影。画面的交替更迭伴随着旁白柔缓的磁性声音，让人看到一些清晰而陈旧的记忆影像。青春与幽怨，狂躁与沉静，政治与世界，战争与杀戮，善与恶，生与死。
人类生存中稍纵即逝的东西，在影片里面被一一呈现。时间的长河里，一切只是沧海一粟。可是分明在这短暂的十分钟的影像里，我们看见了Godard对于和平与人类文明发展的无声呐喊与呼唤。
------------------------------------------------------
生命是一条河。每一个瞬间都可以改变命运，每一个十分钟都在使年华老去。弹指间刹那芳华。一生那么长，又那么短。人类究竟可以做些什么？十五位导演各自有十分钟的答案。而我们的答案，又在哪里？
另外值得一提的是影片里的画面色彩与音乐。一部部短片间隔时候沉静的水流，导演各自运用的黑白或昏黄或明快的色彩，时而沧桑时而现代。配合着小号的高亢明亮与大提琴的委婉低沉，宛见时间长河缓缓流逝。不知此片是否有OST，如此看片之余若亦得原声来听，便真正完美了。
http://www.blogcn.com/User5/vivianisvivian/blog/3474895.html
Mike Figgis 《About Time 2》（美国）
Jirí Menzel 《One Moment》（捷克）
István Szabó 《Ten Minutes After》（匈牙利）
Claire Denis 《Vers Nancy》（法国）
Volker Schlondorff 《The Enlightenment》（德国）
Michael Radford 《Addicted to the Stars》（英国）
Jean-Luc Godard 《Dans le Noir du Temps》（法国）
1. Histoire d'eaux 水的故事
东方与西方，完全不同的民族和国家，不同的肤色和语言。他离开吹笛的老人，遇见她。相识相爱，结婚生子。从最初的一杯清水，到婚宴上的酒，到妻子产前破了的羊水，到最后男人回到老人面前跪地掩面而流下的泪水。
不是很喜欢这个短片。除了片末老人悠扬的笛声。生活充满起落和际遇，不同地域不同言语的人们相遇并且共同生活。平淡平凡，看透风景，细水长流。也许这便是这一段十分钟所代表的含义。
2. About Time 2 关于时间2
说实话，不甚喜欢。或者说，对于Mike Figgis的四格漫画式影片，看起来觉得眼花和头晕。我不知道目光究竟应该集中在那里，也不知道如何将目光分别扩散到屏幕的四个方向去捕捉和看清楚究竟每一格里面究竟在放什么。结果就是，我的眼睛集中在四格中央的黑点上，然后每一格都没有看完看清。
依稀记得的是一些片段。走廊与楼梯里高跟鞋清脆的奔跑声，老人们呼唤孩子名字的殷切，孩子们年少的局促，女人欢笑的红唇与指尖流淌出的清脆钢琴旋律，情欲的亲吻和缠绵……
可是，我实在不知道他想要表达什么。多么惭愧。笑。
3. One Moment 瞬间
这部短片的色彩有着清新淡然的田园风格。Menzel运用了捷克演员Rudolf Hrusinsky一生中拍摄的诸多影片的剪辑拼接成了这一段十分钟。他在院子的苹果树下小憩，朦胧中见到自己。年少时候的身影缓缓走来。黑白、泛黄再到彩色的一个个片段；英俊年轻、瘦长挺拔，成熟坚毅、魁梧强壮，再到松弛苍老却平静的同一张脸。
一生里他饰演了那么多不同的角色，有过那么多的辉煌与荣耀。他隔着铁丝网看见两个女孩。年轻写在脸上，肆意欢笑，短裙在风中飘扬，光滑纤长的腿在阳光里显得白皙而性感。他看她们骑车而过，逐渐消失。一个熟透的红苹果掉落在他的头上。
十分钟。往昔的成就与今昔的垂暮。不可挽回的老去与对年轻风华的眷恋。一切在苹果掉落的瞬间，嘎然而止。
4. Ten Minutes After 十分钟后
电视里一遍又一遍地播放着英语教学的节目。女人正在为结婚纪念日准备着丰富的晚餐。精美餐具，烛台佳肴，香槟蛋糕，还有摄像机。一切准备就绪，她等待着丈夫的归来以及两人甜蜜幸福的庆祝。
门铃响了，女人殷切地跑去开门，却看见醉酒后神志不清的丈夫。进屋后他不停地找酒，跌跌撞撞并且粗暴地吼叫和推搡。她没有生气，只是劝着他并且替他脱鞋宽衣希望他可以睡去。但男人是愤怒的。片中没有交代男人酒醉与暴躁的理由。只是她无法安抚并且使他平静下来，反而愈发地令他狂躁，渐渐丧失了最后的理智。他卡住了她的脖子，她在挣扎与慌乱中，用刀刺向了自己的丈夫。
十分钟。结婚纪念的精心准备一片狼藉，甜蜜温馨被扭打和流血所取代。丈夫被送去医院，警察在现场要求做笔录。电视里英语教学节目依然在继续，柜子上一张张印证着曾经共同欢乐时光的照片，寂静无声。
5. Vers Nancy 面对南希
不得不佩服Claire Denis，居然可以请来Jean-Luc Nancy这个享有盛誉的哲学家，更令人佩服的是，他让这位著名哲学家用了整整十分钟时间坐在火车里，展开了一场一对一的问答讲座，关于“介入”的意识形态，关于进入一个陌生地域的“挣脱”，关于时间、地点与自身交错转换的哲学思考。
专业的学术性话语冗长晦涩。女孩崇敬的眼神与身后黑人男子抽烟远眺的漫不经心形成鲜明的对比。火车还有十分钟即将到站。男人回到座位。他不经意地说，你们谈得真是兴致盎然。Nancy点头。
他答：“但是，时间结束一切”。
6. The Enlightenment 启迪
旁白来自一只小小的苍蝇。从它的口中缓缓地讲出Aurelius Augustinus这位基督神学大师对于时间的自问与论述。镜头忽高忽低摇曳不定，这是苍蝇飞行的轨迹。湖畔林间有一家人在野炊烧烤。人们的轻松闲散与旁白的哲理内涵相去甚远。一边讨论着过去、现在与将来，讨论着时间在点上的短暂与的永恒，而另一边则是嬉笑歌舞，尽情欢乐。
不同的肤色与不同的年纪，男女老幼，酒后小小的不和谐，平凡生活与真实家庭。而当苍蝇飞近正在烤肉的父亲时，他本能地举起铁勺挥舞驱赶，却勾到了上方的电线。瞬间，生命便消逝。接下来的情形是可以想象的。慌乱、哭泣、悲痛。欢乐被这些字眼取代，家庭不再完整。
片子结束在苍蝇撞上灭蝇灯的一瞬。旁白结束，蓝色的灯光变得模糊而斑斓，色彩融合在一起缓缓回归到黑暗。十分钟，一切的欢笑与惬意，任何的哲理与自省，都只是瞬间的逝灭。
7. Addicted to the Stars 沉溺于星
具有科幻的意味，从地球出发，穿越了时空，又来到80年后的地球。
此去经年，物是人非。机器与真人无异，城市翻天覆地，没有人行走，修女抽烟亦不行善。男人在夜里找到自己的家。推开门去，终于见到自己的儿子。眼前已是白发垂暮的老人，满脸皱纹，话语不清。自己仍是出发时的模样，正当壮年。父与子，相对无言感慨万千。他出发前的照片还在，身着宇航服，牵着十来岁的儿子，脸上都是幸福的笑容。
他带给他外星球的石头，然后不得不离去。走到门口的时候，老人缓缓地叫他爸爸。他说，爸爸，我爱你。他回过头来，百感交集。他说，我也爱你。话毕，他只身踏着清冷的街，于天色渐白的凌晨回到基地。
十分钟，时间给这对父子开了这样大的玩笑。孩子从童颜等到鹤发，漫长的一生对于父亲而言不过是短暂的瞬间。山中方一日，世上已千年。一生等待着的父爱与亲情，都因这一声苍老的“我爱你”，而显得格外悲怆与温馨，亦是感人至深。
8. Dans le Noir du Temps 在时间的黑暗中
写到这最后一部短片，Jean-Luc Godard的十分钟。涵盖了太多太多太多的东西，让一切的语言和文字都黯然失色，变得平乏和贫瘠。
拼贴、旁白、旧质的胶片、黑白与暗黄的色彩交错，开片的暗夜与剧终时的烛光，伴随着一部又一部名片佳作的片段。青春、勇气、思想、记忆、长存、爱情、沉默、故事、恐惧、永恒。最终回归到电影。画面的交替更迭伴随着旁白柔缓的磁性声音，让人看到一些清晰而陈旧的记忆影像。青春与幽怨，狂躁与沉静，政治与世界，战争与杀戮，善与恶，生与死。
人类生存中稍纵即逝的东西，在影片里面被一一呈现。时间的长河里，一切只是沧海一粟。可是分明在这短暂的十分钟的影像里，我们看见了Godard对于和平与人类文明发展的无声呐喊与呼唤。
------------------------------------------------------
生命是一条河。每一个瞬间都可以改变命运，每一个十分钟都在使年华老去。弹指间刹那芳华。一生那么长，又那么短。人类究竟可以做些什么？十五位导演各自有十分钟的答案。而我们的答案，又在哪里？
另外值得一提的是影片里的画面色彩与音乐。一部部短片间隔时候沉静的水流，导演各自运用的黑白或昏黄或明快的色彩，时而沧桑时而现代。配合着小号的高亢明亮与大提琴的委婉低沉，宛见时间长河缓缓流逝。不知此片是否有OST，如此看片之余若亦得原声来听，便真正完美了。
http://www.blogcn.com/User5/vivianisvivian/blog/3474895.html
5 ) 十分钟年华老去
十分钟年华老去
我对情节掌握的不是很清楚，所以就说一下我的感悟吧
人生就是由有限个十分钟组成，一个又一个的十分钟带走了我们的青春我们的生命气息
我不懂音乐，但在片尾，当大提琴的声音变得低沉而沧桑时，一个渐渐老去的面容缓慢而及时地呈现在我的面前，有一种震撼的力量，年华流走的那种惊恐与失落突然涌上了我的心头。
十分钟的感情和纪念和决裂，这些人生的碎片深深地触动着我。十分钟，足以摧毁一段美好的感情一个绚丽的人生。这部电影让我不由得想象自己的一个又一个的十分钟，读一篇文章，和朋友聊天，和家人吃一顿饭，听一首歌。。。十分钟，平凡却如此珍贵，以至于失去后用不可得。事实上，我么能有多少个十分钟能无怨无悔呢？
突然就萌发了珍惜光阴的感想。不断涌动的湖泊般的水面像岁月诱人的外表，。可一旦到了生命的极限，十分钟都很奢侈，想到生命终了的那一刻，尘世的那些纷纷绕绕又何足挂齿？有句话叫“乐在当下”。
过去不是最美好的，因为我们再也回不去了，未来也不是最美好的，因为我们还没有抵达，所以过好当前的每一分钟把！心情一直很沉重，也夹杂着一些释然，青春仍握在我手中，我仍有一大把时间可以经营。十分钟，年华老去。历史 现在 未来 都在上演
我对情节掌握的不是很清楚，所以就说一下我的感悟吧
人生就是由有限个十分钟组成，一个又一个的十分钟带走了我们的青春我们的生命气息
我不懂音乐，但在片尾，当大提琴的声音变得低沉而沧桑时，一个渐渐老去的面容缓慢而及时地呈现在我的面前，有一种震撼的力量，年华流走的那种惊恐与失落突然涌上了我的心头。
十分钟的感情和纪念和决裂，这些人生的碎片深深地触动着我。十分钟，足以摧毁一段美好的感情一个绚丽的人生。这部电影让我不由得想象自己的一个又一个的十分钟，读一篇文章，和朋友聊天，和家人吃一顿饭，听一首歌。。。十分钟，平凡却如此珍贵，以至于失去后用不可得。事实上，我么能有多少个十分钟能无怨无悔呢？
突然就萌发了珍惜光阴的感想。不断涌动的湖泊般的水面像岁月诱人的外表，。可一旦到了生命的极限，十分钟都很奢侈，想到生命终了的那一刻，尘世的那些纷纷绕绕又何足挂齿？有句话叫“乐在当下”。
过去不是最美好的，因为我们再也回不去了，未来也不是最美好的，因为我们还没有抵达，所以过好当前的每一分钟把！心情一直很沉重，也夹杂着一些释然，青春仍握在我手中，我仍有一大把时间可以经营。十分钟，年华老去。历史 现在 未来 都在上演
6 ) How do you explain TIME in ten minutes （trumpet&Cello, Schloendoff, Wenders and Herzog）
Time is an abstract concept that we can experience it but can hardly tell. Time is something invisible but when it meets lenses, what can we see?
Ten Minutes older trumpet/ cello is a collection of 15 directors' work of their description of the concept of time. In this collection, Wim Wenders, Wener Herzog and Volker Schleondoff use their own contemplation and lives to explain the question “what is time”.
Wim Wenders signed himself down in this work as usual, the remarkable elements in this work is still highways, music,men and cars. The story he is telling is about a man who got heart attack during the driving. The plot is quiet simple but the way Wenders tells the story is quiet interesting.
The story start with a trouble, and the aim is quiet clear—find the hospital. Then the obstacles come—no one can help, and the man knows he can do nothing but go to the hospital himself.When he finally reaches the hospital, the story was finished successfully. Wenders gets rid of the trouble of the impossibility to tell a big story in this way---tell a tiny story which has a simple plot.
However, the development of the story is quiet cool and out of control.“Here we go”, he said, then the adventure began with Eels's song Souljacker part1. Here we have to spend some words to talk about this song.
Souljacker is a song mixed with anger and Rock, which led people into something special, free and crazy. The scenery we see in the film changed with the melody, it changed the color and the sight is distorted. It looks like Dali's pictures. When you see the windmills, you will feel like stuck into something –That's time. Time becomes slower like what Einstein described in the theory of relativity——the song changes into another Eels song Woman driving, man sleeping, a soft song describes man's dream .The song creates a warm and peaceful atmosphere like going back to home or being shined by the grace of the Lord. And then, the car stops, and he gets his second life.
Something special in this part is that Wenders visualizes time, and man's struggle in time. He described the color and the amazing distortion of time from the sight of an patient. From my own angle, Wenders marked himself significantly with Highway and Rock'n roll music.
Werner Herzog also be himself in this collection. Documentary is what he is famous for so that's the only documentary in this collection. Herzog never do a simple documentary which shoot from a journalist angle---for assure the balance and fact, it avoids any point of view. Herzog made his documentary into an “Author documentary” which show his own thought of world and concept.
He choose a disappearing tribe to represent time. How they found the tribe, what it was like and how it looks like now and future, that's the simple clue of this documentary. The tribe hid in the forest and they even killed white people who live in their domain.
Something unbelievable is that this tribe accepted the crew as well as accepted the gift and medical care. Soon they were changed dramatically. They dressed like us--- do not be naked any more, they went to the big cities, watched TV, even had sex with two white ladies. They accepted those new things without any pain. However, those “gift” killed the tribe---The dream of the new generation is to be a good citizen of a big city, and they prefer to speak Portuguese. Language is the last part of a culture. In the Franco-Prussian War, Arthas was banned from French---culture hegemony started from killing a language—However, the tribe threw their language away voluntarily. The new time swallowed old time softly, old things died like being suffocated in a sweet dream.
However, they are scarred by the past---they still can't understand what's time. They do not need the clock and can't understand it at all. What is time? Why time is so important. In a modern society, punctual is a virtue. But this virtue do not have a long history in our society: Time was emphasized during the Industrial Revolution, to ensure the efficiency. Efficiency is a race with time, the more product you make in certain time, the more profit you gain. But in a tribe, the only thing they need to know is “the face of sun and moon.” The standard of efficiency in the tribe is whether you can feed yourself and your family. Compared to them, “What you need is less than what you expect” is a maxim to our lives.
The inability of understanding time demonstrate that time is an artificial concept. People always need something to locate themselves, we made meridian and parallel to locate ourselves and we need time to fix us on the time dimensionality. What a pity, we are resist of the freedom of floating in nihility.
The final film is from Volk Schlondolf. Schlondolf is a director who can shoot something gigantic, and his work has strong insinuate of time. Like the Tin Drum, he use the eyes of a boy who resist to grow up to observe an epoch of time and human nature. He used a lot of metaphors to build up his own concept.
The clip Enlightenment is an unique work because of the following reasons:
1: View angle and the movement of camera.
2: The setting of monologue.
3: The setting of the climax.
The director set the the camera as the eyes of an mosquito. Mosquito is something almost invisible. Also, it is an outsider which hold no power and no status to things on air. But it's free, when it travels from river side to the forest. Though it's a view sight from an insect, it seems that it choose what to see and whom to observe.
Because the viewer is something that can fly, so the camera twist in angles that out of rules. It just move freely, but steady. It makes the viewer get some power to chose the scenery. The firm shoot seems to add some spiritual to the viewer—it is not an ephemeral insect which has no intelligence. It is subjective but with firm will. At that moment, it seems that the viewer is not a mosquito any more, it's the God. However, God never interfere people's affair, it just observe and let things happen.
The coordination of movement and the special optic angle model the attitude
The setting of the monologue is the other “outsider”. The voice has no control of the happening issue, also, it comes from a ancient famous bishop called Augustinus who wrote a book called Confession. Confession is a book that Augustinus confessed himself to the Lord. Augustinus' thought of time is very philosophic. He talks about his confusion of the malposition feeling of time that caused by the unequality between the physical and incorporeal experience of time. And the monologue also cause the malposition feeling of the image and the voice. The magical feeling of “malposition” makes the concept of time subliming and solid.
The dramatical ending form two death, one is the man in the film and the other is the death of the “observer”, the mosquito. The man's death seems to prove the fragile of the concept of time. You can never “occupy” time. You have no power on time like you have no power to the sudden death. Though Herzog shows that time is an artificial concept, however, Schleondoff used his lenses to show his rejection. From Schleondoff's view, the essence of time is abstract and transeunt, only the concept of time is man made. It seems a power that force history flows, society changes and our lives pass.
At the end of the film, The dimension malposition was discarded. “You my God brings me enlightenment, you will be my lantern.I'll come toward your light.You, my God will make my darkness bright, and brighter and brighter...” There comes to a grinding halt, with the death of the witness.
The end of our time is death. But our time died, the time of others will continue. “There will be no present if there isn't something exist.” said Augustinus. Our deaths cause us lose the present of our time. But we changed into the past time of others.
When you question about which one of the three directors describe time best.I think it's hard to tell. They showed their own point of view and their feature and character. Wenders succeeded in visualizing time, Herzog did a good job in showing the relationship between primitive society and modern society (including comparing the state of people living under two conditions of society. ) Also he showed his own concept that time is an artificial concept. Schleondoff created a malposition scene by using some common material. He fixed the material together and creating the feeling of “uncomfortable”. He created an atmosphere for people to get involve into his speculation.
From my own point of view, Schloendoff did the best job to describe the abstract concept. He did this short film in an philosophic way, that is excavating essence out of huge chaos. Also, he demised the right of speculating and describing time to audience.----“I do confess my lord that I don't yet know what time is.” Schloendoff is the only director who tell audience “I don't know yet.” That's really brave. What schloendoff showed is Time in philosophy which create a good chain to tie the past, present and future. The other two directors though showed themselves and their own concept, they just stop at a stage which is some place farer from the surface of an issue or object, they didn't actually touched the confusion of time. They answer the question in an easier way which is finding something which had experienced or was experiencing the confusion or the problem of time to show what time is. They didn't face the question itself. So I think their work still has some more way to go.
Ten Minutes older trumpet/ cello is a collection of 15 directors' work of their description of the concept of time. In this collection, Wim Wenders, Wener Herzog and Volker Schleondoff use their own contemplation and lives to explain the question “what is time”.
Wim Wenders signed himself down in this work as usual, the remarkable elements in this work is still highways, music,men and cars. The story he is telling is about a man who got heart attack during the driving. The plot is quiet simple but the way Wenders tells the story is quiet interesting.
The story start with a trouble, and the aim is quiet clear—find the hospital. Then the obstacles come—no one can help, and the man knows he can do nothing but go to the hospital himself.When he finally reaches the hospital, the story was finished successfully. Wenders gets rid of the trouble of the impossibility to tell a big story in this way---tell a tiny story which has a simple plot.
However, the development of the story is quiet cool and out of control.“Here we go”, he said, then the adventure began with Eels's song Souljacker part1. Here we have to spend some words to talk about this song.
Souljacker is a song mixed with anger and Rock, which led people into something special, free and crazy. The scenery we see in the film changed with the melody, it changed the color and the sight is distorted. It looks like Dali's pictures. When you see the windmills, you will feel like stuck into something –That's time. Time becomes slower like what Einstein described in the theory of relativity——the song changes into another Eels song Woman driving, man sleeping, a soft song describes man's dream .The song creates a warm and peaceful atmosphere like going back to home or being shined by the grace of the Lord. And then, the car stops, and he gets his second life.
Something special in this part is that Wenders visualizes time, and man's struggle in time. He described the color and the amazing distortion of time from the sight of an patient. From my own angle, Wenders marked himself significantly with Highway and Rock'n roll music.
Werner Herzog also be himself in this collection. Documentary is what he is famous for so that's the only documentary in this collection. Herzog never do a simple documentary which shoot from a journalist angle---for assure the balance and fact, it avoids any point of view. Herzog made his documentary into an “Author documentary” which show his own thought of world and concept.
He choose a disappearing tribe to represent time. How they found the tribe, what it was like and how it looks like now and future, that's the simple clue of this documentary. The tribe hid in the forest and they even killed white people who live in their domain.
Something unbelievable is that this tribe accepted the crew as well as accepted the gift and medical care. Soon they were changed dramatically. They dressed like us--- do not be naked any more, they went to the big cities, watched TV, even had sex with two white ladies. They accepted those new things without any pain. However, those “gift” killed the tribe---The dream of the new generation is to be a good citizen of a big city, and they prefer to speak Portuguese. Language is the last part of a culture. In the Franco-Prussian War, Arthas was banned from French---culture hegemony started from killing a language—However, the tribe threw their language away voluntarily. The new time swallowed old time softly, old things died like being suffocated in a sweet dream.
However, they are scarred by the past---they still can't understand what's time. They do not need the clock and can't understand it at all. What is time? Why time is so important. In a modern society, punctual is a virtue. But this virtue do not have a long history in our society: Time was emphasized during the Industrial Revolution, to ensure the efficiency. Efficiency is a race with time, the more product you make in certain time, the more profit you gain. But in a tribe, the only thing they need to know is “the face of sun and moon.” The standard of efficiency in the tribe is whether you can feed yourself and your family. Compared to them, “What you need is less than what you expect” is a maxim to our lives.
The inability of understanding time demonstrate that time is an artificial concept. People always need something to locate themselves, we made meridian and parallel to locate ourselves and we need time to fix us on the time dimensionality. What a pity, we are resist of the freedom of floating in nihility.
The final film is from Volk Schlondolf. Schlondolf is a director who can shoot something gigantic, and his work has strong insinuate of time. Like the Tin Drum, he use the eyes of a boy who resist to grow up to observe an epoch of time and human nature. He used a lot of metaphors to build up his own concept.
The clip Enlightenment is an unique work because of the following reasons:
1: View angle and the movement of camera.
2: The setting of monologue.
3: The setting of the climax.
The director set the the camera as the eyes of an mosquito. Mosquito is something almost invisible. Also, it is an outsider which hold no power and no status to things on air. But it's free, when it travels from river side to the forest. Though it's a view sight from an insect, it seems that it choose what to see and whom to observe.
Because the viewer is something that can fly, so the camera twist in angles that out of rules. It just move freely, but steady. It makes the viewer get some power to chose the scenery. The firm shoot seems to add some spiritual to the viewer—it is not an ephemeral insect which has no intelligence. It is subjective but with firm will. At that moment, it seems that the viewer is not a mosquito any more, it's the God. However, God never interfere people's affair, it just observe and let things happen.
The coordination of movement and the special optic angle model the attitude
The setting of the monologue is the other “outsider”. The voice has no control of the happening issue, also, it comes from a ancient famous bishop called Augustinus who wrote a book called Confession. Confession is a book that Augustinus confessed himself to the Lord. Augustinus' thought of time is very philosophic. He talks about his confusion of the malposition feeling of time that caused by the unequality between the physical and incorporeal experience of time. And the monologue also cause the malposition feeling of the image and the voice. The magical feeling of “malposition” makes the concept of time subliming and solid.
The dramatical ending form two death, one is the man in the film and the other is the death of the “observer”, the mosquito. The man's death seems to prove the fragile of the concept of time. You can never “occupy” time. You have no power on time like you have no power to the sudden death. Though Herzog shows that time is an artificial concept, however, Schleondoff used his lenses to show his rejection. From Schleondoff's view, the essence of time is abstract and transeunt, only the concept of time is man made. It seems a power that force history flows, society changes and our lives pass.
At the end of the film, The dimension malposition was discarded. “You my God brings me enlightenment, you will be my lantern.I'll come toward your light.You, my God will make my darkness bright, and brighter and brighter...” There comes to a grinding halt, with the death of the witness.
The end of our time is death. But our time died, the time of others will continue. “There will be no present if there isn't something exist.” said Augustinus. Our deaths cause us lose the present of our time. But we changed into the past time of others.
When you question about which one of the three directors describe time best.I think it's hard to tell. They showed their own point of view and their feature and character. Wenders succeeded in visualizing time, Herzog did a good job in showing the relationship between primitive society and modern society (including comparing the state of people living under two conditions of society. ) Also he showed his own concept that time is an artificial concept. Schleondoff created a malposition scene by using some common material. He fixed the material together and creating the feeling of “uncomfortable”. He created an atmosphere for people to get involve into his speculation.
From my own point of view, Schloendoff did the best job to describe the abstract concept. He did this short film in an philosophic way, that is excavating essence out of huge chaos. Also, he demised the right of speculating and describing time to audience.----“I do confess my lord that I don't yet know what time is.” Schloendoff is the only director who tell audience “I don't know yet.” That's really brave. What schloendoff showed is Time in philosophy which create a good chain to tie the past, present and future. The other two directors though showed themselves and their own concept, they just stop at a stage which is some place farer from the surface of an issue or object, they didn't actually touched the confusion of time. They answer the question in an easier way which is finding something which had experienced or was experiencing the confusion or the problem of time to show what time is. They didn't face the question itself. So I think their work still has some more way to go.
按顺序评分：三星半，四星，四星，两星半，两星，三星半，三星半，四星。大提琴篇在叙事方面确实弱了很多，大部分都是以独特的镜头语言来表达内心的丰富思考，麦克菲吉斯，伊利曼佐和戈达尔的思想性和艺术性都很强，施隆多夫的荒诞和思辨结合、贝托鲁奇凝练的剪接，迈克尔莱德福的太空与伦理尚可一看
喜欢贝托鲁奇水的故事，生活如水的哲学意义发人深思又让人感动；曼佐对一个男人一生的描述，让人对生命之流逝伤感不已；施隆多夫对时间存在的探讨精彩之极，摄影方式也很特别；雷德福探讨了未来时间，同样满是伤感；戈达尔最后对时间在生命处处影响的总结达成全片完满，也让对时间的探讨达到顶峰。
混噩无所清晰中度过了人生。还是回归永恒轮回。虚无与真实无法平衡趋向无望，那浮的在上沉淀的在下。灿若星辰的年华老去，片段的永恒性的瞬间回忆。生命并不为更加漫长。正如车站与站台之间，词汇与词汇之间。我们寻找词汇从这一领域到那一领域。进入现在时一切预想的都变小了正如我们的一生在时间里。
补签。消化大提琴篇所需的脑力可能是小号篇的两到三倍。最喜欢施隆多夫苍蝇视点的漂浮摄影，以及戈达尔在破坏的同时重构了影像的逻辑关系还有文本的逻辑关系。萨博完全隐遁于冲突的长镜头、迈克·菲吉斯的四个分屏叙事实验性有余而叙事的完成度不足。
5 stars to godard who made me cry inside
Cello篇還是木有多大驚喜。有點故弄玄虛。僅有一位女導演法國滴。水的故事還不錯。有些人解讀的很深刻。但偶只看看表面。
印象最深的应该是《水的故事》，在中国这叫南柯一梦。
没有巴黎我爱你和每个人有自己的电影好看
年华的老去是最无言的一种怅惘。就是十分钟让你老一次，每次都不一样。每个都是你，每个都不完全是你。最喜欢戈达尔
在时间的黑暗中：我要用它去结束一个人的生命，我不知道 他会喜不喜欢。你想马上死，还是慢慢的死 。马上。。。。妈妈 有思想的我是幸福的，幸福的思想，可是现在我要背离这一幸福。 有很多书还很新，你真的要放弃它们？一旦放弃，就再也回不到你手中。垃圾车是它们的归宿。 我们一无所有，这是我们最终的结局。 有新的欲望在我心中升腾，就象初次上路却骄傲的那匹马。与你做对，我尝到苦果，有所了结。 他说 黑夜 她说 黑夜 他们说 黑夜
在永恒的时间面前，我们无法取胜，我们只有用文字和影像铭刻下时光的一点一滴，因为时间就如同奔腾的洪流不可阻挡，一切事物只要进入眼帘就被它冲走成为历史，日晷、水钟、沙漏、香、漏壶、蜡烛、盂漏等等只能够对时间做出表面性记录，而时间究竟是什么？
第一部：水的故事。第二部：关于时间 2 。第三部：一瞬间 。第四部：十分钟后 。第五部：面对南茜 。第六部：启迪 。第七部：沉溺于星 。第八部：在时间的黑暗之中
《十分钟年华老去》由英国“10分钟，年华老去"有限公司斥资上亿元人民币拍摄，邀请了15位世界大师级导演，旨在展示当代世界电影的最高艺术水 准，15位导演各拍10分钟，串成一部150分钟的电影。每位导演在10分钟内所选择的主题和题材不拘一格。这十五部短片分为大提琴篇和小号篇。
6/10。每个导演用十分钟尝试实验性的电影语言，有一镜到底、有实时对话、有广角分屏技术、也有把人一生的影像叠化放映、更有对自己昔日作品的混剪，但以短片的时长所限还想表达生死时间类的命题就太仓促了，整体的每个故事要理解起来都很费劲，大量多维度的场景切换会令人头昏脑胀，总之看得比较沉睡。
伯纳多·贝托鲁奇意大利末代皇帝水的故事；迈克·菲吉斯英国远离拉斯维加斯关于时间2；伊利·曼佐捷克严密监视的列车一瞬间；伊斯特凡·萨伯匈牙利摩菲斯特十分钟后；克莱尔·丹尼斯法国日烦夜烦面对南希；沃尔克·施隆多夫德国铁皮鼓启迪；迈克尔·雷德福英国邮差沉溺于星；让－吕克·戈达尔法国精疲力尽在时间的黑暗之中；
《水的故事》8分；《关于时间2》6分；《一瞬间》5分；《十分钟后》7分；《面对南希》3分；《启迪》5分；《沉溺于星》7分；《在时间的黑暗之中》6分。
时光易逝，年华易老。十分钟就把“时间”这个神奇的物件讲述的让人回味无穷，时间的真像，我们无从知晓，但我们总是乐此不彼的追问青春，感慨流年。
看这些导演都在关注什么
今天看的是《ten minutes older》中“水的故事”和“关于时间2”。第一个嘛，太太太……淡如水了，也许像标题一样，流水般的日子过去，男人又回到原点。没有名字的主角。
水的故事、关于时间2、一瞬间、十分钟后都不错。面对Nancy——法国人自爆其短。