剧照
更新时间：2023-08-16 02:14
详细剧情
1939年，纳粹德国占领波兰，并随之对当地的犹太人进行屠杀与驱逐。大量犹太人在屠杀中遇害，少量犹太人隐藏于森林之中，幸免于难。图维那•比尔斯基（丹尼尔·克雷格饰）便是这群犹太人中的一员。但他并不是一个普通的受害者。 双亲被德军残害的图维那在森林中遇到了两个弟弟——祖斯（列维•施瑞博尔饰）与阿斯贝（杰米•贝尔饰），3人一同准备从波兰前往白俄罗斯。但在森林中，他们遇到了幸存的犹太人同伴。大家逐渐聚集起来，食物与物资开始出现短缺，德军的追杀又令他们措手不及。这时，图维那做出了一个惊人的决定：建立一支游击队，反抗德军的进攻。面对德军的精良武器与人海大军，图维那能带领他的部队成功反抗吗？
长篇影评
1 ) 留下是死，走出去也可能是死，但也可能是活
我的体会：这部电影里，看到了一个原本孤立于众人之外的犹太群体，如何在受到残酷迫害后，慢慢学着团结。学会在面对禽兽般的暴力时，保持住人性，不让自己变为禽兽。昨天@王媛 老师说“爱自己”——这部电影讲的就是爱自己，保持人的尊严。
电影第一男主角图维亚读书成绩并不好，这群难民里有他的老师，一个高雅的知识分子。但是面对残暴的纳粹，面对血淋林的屠戮，老师的信念几乎崩溃了。最后，老师在长途奔袭中去世，去世前对自己的学生说：我几乎都失去了自己的信念，但是你让我重拾了信念。
图维亚作为这样一群由各色人组成的犹太难民，面对来自兄弟的挑战，面对群里奸诈之辈的挑战时，都显示出了力挽狂澜的英雄本色，真仿佛摩西重现。但是，在一次大轰炸后，他几乎失去了听力，意识也模糊了不少，这时遇到一条大河，他的坚定意志开始犹豫，他以为遇到了绝路，几乎放弃了求生的意志。这时，受到他数次激励的小弟弟亚赛头脑变得清醒，鼓励众人解下腰带，拧成绳子，老老少少把绳子系在腰上，趟过了大河，求生成功。
我在这部电影里看到了领导力的真实体现，看到了一个原本松散的群体能够健康发展，需要怎样的理念和行为。这部电影又多么像创业者将走过的路：留下是死，走出去也可能是死，但也可能是活。to be or not to be。
这部电影，和《逃离索比堡》一样，会成为我记忆中排名前五的二战影片。
电影第一男主角图维亚读书成绩并不好，这群难民里有他的老师，一个高雅的知识分子。但是面对残暴的纳粹，面对血淋林的屠戮，老师的信念几乎崩溃了。最后，老师在长途奔袭中去世，去世前对自己的学生说：我几乎都失去了自己的信念，但是你让我重拾了信念。
图维亚作为这样一群由各色人组成的犹太难民，面对来自兄弟的挑战，面对群里奸诈之辈的挑战时，都显示出了力挽狂澜的英雄本色，真仿佛摩西重现。但是，在一次大轰炸后，他几乎失去了听力，意识也模糊了不少，这时遇到一条大河，他的坚定意志开始犹豫，他以为遇到了绝路，几乎放弃了求生的意志。这时，受到他数次激励的小弟弟亚赛头脑变得清醒，鼓励众人解下腰带，拧成绳子，老老少少把绳子系在腰上，趟过了大河，求生成功。
我在这部电影里看到了领导力的真实体现，看到了一个原本松散的群体能够健康发展，需要怎样的理念和行为。这部电影又多么像创业者将走过的路：留下是死，走出去也可能是死，但也可能是活。to be or not to be。
这部电影，和《逃离索比堡》一样，会成为我记忆中排名前五的二战影片。
2 ) The Landscape of War
The history of Belorussia in World War II is largely ignored at best. Given that, it has become so much harder to depict the story of the Bielski Partisans on the big screen. Only the fact is clear: that the Bielski brothers managed to save over 1,200 Jewish people by hiding in the Nalibocka forest from the mean war machine of the Nazis. What the Partisans did was hardly imaginable today, and may involve some extreme moral challenges that cannot be pictured without causing a emotional discomfort of the audiences.
Good for the director Edward Zwick, he did not mean to compare the Bielskis with Steven Spielberg’s German Righteous among the Nations Oskar Schindler, nor did he want to produce a sentimental and moving epic as Schindler’s List. He was very clear about the idea of the picture when he set out to make it: to tell a story about how Jewish people defy their fate of being slaughtered, not that about their being killed and rescued by Germans.
The story-telling may not be a tour de force like that of Schindler’s List, nor does the film has a nemesis character like Amon Goeth, yet the viewing pleasure is not reduced. As always, Edward Zwick did not insert a stereotype evil character into his film, but throw us directly into the historical and ethnic environment of the movie’s settings, and reveal layers and layers of conflicts. Again in this movie he managed to depict complex interaction between multitudes of humanity and a dramatic age full of overwhelming events, while keeping the audiences’ fist clenched and them sitting at the edge of the chair.
A central conflict in this movie is brought to the face of our protagonists by their very purpose: to survive and defy the fate that has descended on their nation. In the huge, all-devouring grinder of the war, to escape being victims, the only way is to become the ones who impose destruction on the enemies. This brings the fundamental conflict into play: to what extent can one gain power while sustaining empathy and humanity. All the other conflicts, such as those between Jewish combatant and non-combatant, and between Jewish and German people, are all developed around the fundamental conflict. These conflicts work as prisms, which refract multiple facets of human nature, which makes the landscape of war more alive and more realistic. The behaviours of the groups of Jew is no longer innocent or morally perfect as some other war movies depicted, but are convincing and arousing compassion.
The director has done a good job telling a story of people in desperate conditions, and was greatly helped by a group of great actors, although many of them are not famous. Although not without caveats, in most part the acting is natural and compelling. You would feel that those are really Jewish people in that time, beaten-up, self-preserving, yet willing to fight beside their charismatic leader. Being often seeing real-life Jewish people, I thought Daniel Craig was too British to act as a Jewish leader, but he really brings out the leader’s spirit. Yet in some action scenes he still reminds me of Bond.
Although the story can well be adapted into a high profile action movie, or at least an epic movie with the excitement of Last Samurai, Zwick has chosen to reflect the day-to-day struggle and sacrifice in the forest, this may make the movie less a block buster, but surely is not a bad thing if we consider its values in preserving a piece of forgotten history. Although there are some inconsistency in the plot, and the first half was a bit slow, Defiance is nevertheless one of the best movies depicting the brave struggles in WWII.
Good for the director Edward Zwick, he did not mean to compare the Bielskis with Steven Spielberg’s German Righteous among the Nations Oskar Schindler, nor did he want to produce a sentimental and moving epic as Schindler’s List. He was very clear about the idea of the picture when he set out to make it: to tell a story about how Jewish people defy their fate of being slaughtered, not that about their being killed and rescued by Germans.
The story-telling may not be a tour de force like that of Schindler’s List, nor does the film has a nemesis character like Amon Goeth, yet the viewing pleasure is not reduced. As always, Edward Zwick did not insert a stereotype evil character into his film, but throw us directly into the historical and ethnic environment of the movie’s settings, and reveal layers and layers of conflicts. Again in this movie he managed to depict complex interaction between multitudes of humanity and a dramatic age full of overwhelming events, while keeping the audiences’ fist clenched and them sitting at the edge of the chair.
A central conflict in this movie is brought to the face of our protagonists by their very purpose: to survive and defy the fate that has descended on their nation. In the huge, all-devouring grinder of the war, to escape being victims, the only way is to become the ones who impose destruction on the enemies. This brings the fundamental conflict into play: to what extent can one gain power while sustaining empathy and humanity. All the other conflicts, such as those between Jewish combatant and non-combatant, and between Jewish and German people, are all developed around the fundamental conflict. These conflicts work as prisms, which refract multiple facets of human nature, which makes the landscape of war more alive and more realistic. The behaviours of the groups of Jew is no longer innocent or morally perfect as some other war movies depicted, but are convincing and arousing compassion.
The director has done a good job telling a story of people in desperate conditions, and was greatly helped by a group of great actors, although many of them are not famous. Although not without caveats, in most part the acting is natural and compelling. You would feel that those are really Jewish people in that time, beaten-up, self-preserving, yet willing to fight beside their charismatic leader. Being often seeing real-life Jewish people, I thought Daniel Craig was too British to act as a Jewish leader, but he really brings out the leader’s spirit. Yet in some action scenes he still reminds me of Bond.
Although the story can well be adapted into a high profile action movie, or at least an epic movie with the excitement of Last Samurai, Zwick has chosen to reflect the day-to-day struggle and sacrifice in the forest, this may make the movie less a block buster, but surely is not a bad thing if we consider its values in preserving a piece of forgotten history. Although there are some inconsistency in the plot, and the first half was a bit slow, Defiance is nevertheless one of the best movies depicting the brave struggles in WWII.
3 ) 犹太民族的反抗
看电影的过程中总在想如果片中的是一群中国人，故事会怎么发展，也许是民族自豪感在作祟，我认为中华民族与犹太民族相比，要更为具有反抗精神。 从出埃及记中可以窥见犹太民族是一个退让的民族，组织起来与压迫者对抗似乎不存在于他们的文化中，或许这就是太聪明的后果，凡事总采用最保险的措施。就像其中的一个片断，主人公要去救一个地区的同胞，其中的一个长者却说走一个，德军就杀十个，他们不能冒因为小的利益而牺牲大的利益的风险，他认为慢慢地与德国人耗，总会有赢得曙光的一天。这就是犹太人，用理智应对一切，却不知对手是冷血非理智的禽兽一般的纳粹，根本不会跟你谈划算与否。 整部影片中，犹太人都是在森林中躲避着德国人的袭击，他们仿佛希望通过另建一个世界，来逃避原来世界的追杀。可事情根本没有那么简单，德国人仍是对这群无辜的人们穷追不舍，他们要的是赶尽杀绝。直到最后时刻，主人公们仿佛才被迫地认识到不反抗是不会有安宁的。最后的反抗很振奋人心，但也十分短暂。 我佩服犹太人的聪明，但我庆幸自己是中国人。设想我们的民族也是那么软弱可欺，只会逃避的话，或许现在早没有中华民族的国家了，只会有数量众多的华人流浪者，在世界各地庸碌而分散地繁衍着。
4 ) 一个人如何带领一群人从困境中存活下来
一个人从困境中存活下来，需要运气。一群人从困境中存活下来，需要团结。一个人带领一群人从困境中存活下来，则需要领袖气质。
从导演的技术水平来看，本片并非绝佳的范例——至少，我认为将2个小时的长度缩减至90分钟可能更为合适——但，本片故事所讲述的英雄精神，则值得每个人借鉴，尤其是在这个金融危机的当下。
------------------------------------
www.leeforce.com
从导演的技术水平来看，本片并非绝佳的范例——至少，我认为将2个小时的长度缩减至90分钟可能更为合适——但，本片故事所讲述的英雄精神，则值得每个人借鉴，尤其是在这个金融危机的当下。
------------------------------------
www.leeforce.com
5 ) 通过这部电影，Defiance这个词给我很深的体会
什么是Defiance？蔑视已有的规则，挑战它，推翻它。
片中犹太人反抗纳粹暴政，同时还反抗斯大林的专制，这就是他们的Defiance，这个词用在犹太人身上，是如此贴切，如此精准！
Defiance西方很重要的一种价值观，反映了人追求自由这一特质。《逃离克隆岛》的主人公，总是对身边的事物提出疑问，他就是一个反叛者，是充满Defiance的人物。可见，这一反抗精神在西方人眼中是多么受到推崇。
我们的确需要Defiance的精神，从怀疑到反抗到建立更公平合理的规则。
片中犹太人反抗纳粹暴政，同时还反抗斯大林的专制，这就是他们的Defiance，这个词用在犹太人身上，是如此贴切，如此精准！
Defiance西方很重要的一种价值观，反映了人追求自由这一特质。《逃离克隆岛》的主人公，总是对身边的事物提出疑问，他就是一个反叛者，是充满Defiance的人物。可见，这一反抗精神在西方人眼中是多么受到推崇。
我们的确需要Defiance的精神，从怀疑到反抗到建立更公平合理的规则。
6 ) 人物传记式电影
人如何能知道自己为什么战斗，而且如此坚定的坚持，非硝烟的生活可能更难明白这些，一贯喜欢坚韧的故事，尤其喜欢镜头的运用，人物肖像照的经典案例，婚礼那场也经典的美丽，大光比的人物面部用光，肖像轮廓光运用也相当老到……
兹威克也算是好莱坞的一流匠人，什么都拍得，什么都还拍的可以；这部也是：中规中矩，四平八稳，倒是有几个地方看出了野心，结果却反倒和全片基调相左，尤其是夜袭警察局那段的剪辑和镜头，怎么看怎么不舒服；最动人的还是史实本身，"我们最好的反抗就是活下去"，怪激荡的。
挺“集结号”的，但不如号。NO MORE WAR。
片子节奏有点问题，别的都还中规中矩，至少挺好看的。alexa真是period啊，演1940s的姑娘好自然，戏份也好多~等不及跟Fury一起做Joesmine AU惹！以及另外个tag有点怪是因为看到后面有German tank所以不自觉地tag了David :) 还有这片的场景大概跟我Fury x Zookeeper那个crossover的脑洞一模一样...
战争总是能放大人性的，或坏或好，使生命的河流奔流不息，回旋激荡。
爱德华·兹威克的水准发挥，真实历史改编，关于自救和抵抗的故事，实属难得，色调质感极好，森林里的生活与战斗，既有浪漫轻柔的美感，也有缺衣少食的冷酷，好在大家没变成疯狂的野兽，人性光环没丢，保持了最大的尊严，而且最终还胜利了。
不是比尔斯基，而是比埃尔斯基，妥妥的波兰-立陶宛犹太人。莽莽的东欧林沼庇护着林中的兄弟姐妹老人孩子免遭纳粹与苏联的屠戮
但凡有两个男主角的战争片，总有一个是我不喜欢的。两个绿眼珠我喜欢淡一点的那个。最后的营救还是他。其实深色的又有什么错，战争本身就是个错误。ps，最烦关键时刻扯爱情！OST好。
这样的“二战和犹太人”电影，考虑到是2008年才拍出来的，其实并不出彩，虽然based on a true story。但战争——尤其是站在“正义”一边——的确是个赚口碑的还素材。PS：林雪婚礼那段拍得真好，剪得更棒。
还专门和人争论过为什么要找克雷格这么一看就知道不是犹太人的家伙来主演，卧槽，回想起来真是不能急了，争个妹妹熊哟。。。
Edward Zwick虽然一直在好莱坞拍大片儿，可是一直都比较弱，包括《燃情岁月》……这个片子打着现实主义的大旗，实际上却是一部非常不现实的意识形态轶闻片。且不说一开始就暗示的摩西传说，片子的根底究竟是defiance纳粹还是共产主义还非常值得深究。就我的感觉似乎反共更深！而且还暗示美国是上帝的伊甸，说德国人和俄国人都是胡子，所以上帝一定没有胡子，然后接着说罗斯福没有胡子。片子的剪辑也很有问题，记得其中一处的交叉剪辑，居然把campus居民训练射击和Craig骑白马剪在一块儿，什么意思？暗示他是民贼么？
影评写了一大篇却死机了，不写了。导演延续了一贯的好莱坞史诗与独立批判精神的融合风格。天衣无缝的情节展开没有任何莫名其妙、匪夷所思的突兀笔墨，根据回忆录改编的电影，就是比坐屋子里空想出来的文艺片有力量。绝境生存状态下的人性与无国家民众自发形成的社区秩序，是本片的闪光点。
原故事可歌可泣，可惜像我这样被洗脑过的人，只把这部犹太人的流亡电影当做红军长征来看，特别是看到“红一”和“红四”会师时，老子一口血喷到了电视上。此片还再次强调了一条放之四海而皆准的真理：老毛子永永远远都TM靠不住！
被低估的战争电影，避难的临时夫妻，动荡年代的特殊组合形式。四兄弟性格迥异，各有人格魅力。配乐很煽情、台词直至灵魂深处
熬过寒冷和充满疾病的冬天，我们就能迎来温暖的春天，我们沐浴清晨第一缕阳光，我们在河里洗澡嬉戏，我们在人群里遇见爱情，我们在森林里建筑自己的家园。上帝不会为我们指出道路，我们穿过河流穿过沼泽，自己为自己走出一条活下去的道路
三星半。最后还是止于很合格的好莱坞传奇剧情片，一切矛盾冲突都是为了起承转合。Edward Zwick依然宣泄着他的把残酷浪漫化个人英雄化的能力，James Newton Howard的原声是大亮点
让我难忘的是Tuvia作为领导者的艰难处境，在人人都疯狂绝望的战争年代。婚礼与战争的平行剪辑。
二战和犹太人永远是个好题材。故事并没有什么出彩的地方，看点还是 Daniel Craig。
Defiance.DVDRip.XviD-DoNE
真实事件还能拍得这么假，面对这群乌合之众德军也太不给力了吧。导演水平太差，不停的靠音乐煽还撑不住。一帮金发碧眼的英国人演犹太人也实在难有说服力，为啥白俄罗斯人讲俄语，而犹太人讲英语？我和片中人的唯一共识是：这片森林风景不错。我刚讲完丹尼尔·克雷格就也这么说了。
这是一部对我来说无可挑剔的优秀战争片，再看看我们的战争片，哎，都是小朋友过家家的游戏，残脑加幼稚！